Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2016, 6:32 am
The Court of Appeals has upheld the verdict.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:52 am
ACS Human Services LLC, September 26, 2016, Simon, P.). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
These three paragraphs state cumulative conditions. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:47 pm
US v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:59 am
ACE Fire Underwriters v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:59 am
ACE Fire Underwriters v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:01 am
In the recent case of ACE Fire Underwriters v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 12:16 pm
Following the New York Court of Appeals decision in the closely-followed case of ACE Securities Corp., Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-SL2 v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
Blocking orders against ISPs to combat trade-mark infringement legal says Court of Appeal in Cartier
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
This duty, which equity will enforce with an injunction, was described in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 as follows: ” If a man has in his possession or control goods the dissemination of which, whether in the way of trade or, possibly, merely by way of gifts (see Upmann v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
Bd. of Education v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:16 am
A decision last month by the Appellate Court of Connecticut — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in Warren v Cuseo Family, LLC, AC 37239 [May 3, 2016], dealt with an interesting set of facts involving the estate of the majority owner of a family-owned LLC and produced an unusual but not surprising ruling giving the executor extraordinary power as temporary receiver to wind up the LLC’s… [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am
Hacking into systems is the purview of the CFAA and state anti-hacking statutes. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
