Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 681 - 700 of 7,948
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 7:52 am by Howard Bashman
Wade”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
In a case highly dependent on its very unusual facts, the Court of Appeal in Griffiths v Tickle ([2021] EWCA Civ 1882) confirmed (in dismissing an appeal) that a mother and father involved in Children Act 1989 proceedings can be identified. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Corina Weigl
In my last blog I discussed the decision in McPeake v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:38 am by Rick Hasen
Following up on this post linking to the must-read Adam Liptak column on Monica Youn’s important study, here’s what Chief Justice Roberts today said at argument in FCC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 12:25 pm by Paul Caron
TaxProf Blog op-ed: Opponents Of Clergy Housing Allowance Should Turn To Congress And The IRS After 7th Circuit's Rejection Of Establishment Clause Challenge, by Adam Chorodow (Arizona State): The Seventh Circuit recently issued its long-awaited decision in Gaylor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
The Times’ Adam Liptak continues his exceptional reporting with a column today on the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in Iqbal v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Adam Chilton (Chicago; Google Scholar), Justin Driver (Yale), Jonathan S. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
Here is the schedule for my Spring 2017 Pepperdine Tax Policy Workshop Series: Jan. 25 Adam Chodorow (Arizona State), The Parsonage Exemption Feb. 6 Katherine Pratt (Loyola-L.A.), The Tax Definition of “Medical Care:” A Critique of the Startling IRS Arguments in O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 8:59 pm
Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:25 am
Interesting case.6-25-2010 Indiana:Although state law allows police to request identification from passengers inside a car that they’ve stopped, two Indianapolis officers shouldn’t have arrested a man for refusing to identify himself when there was no reasonable suspicion he’d done anything wrong.The Indiana Court of Appeals addressed that issue in a six-page opinion today in Adam Starr v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:43 pm by Victoria VanBuren
  Forbes has an interesting article regarding the recent FINRA arbitration  Lehman Brothers Holdings v Adam David Sloan  (FINRA Arbitration 11-01774, October 17, 2012): In a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in May 2011, Claimant Lehman Brothers sought to recover by the close of the hearing $357,142.86 in outstanding principal; $79,244.88 accrued interest; and $53,571.43 in collection costs. [read post]