Search for: "Amendment To the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar"
Results 681 - 700
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 7:53 am
I’m assuming the State’s counties do not otherwise possess a ‘home rule’ power to regulate adult businesses, which seems odd if true. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The ruling can be extended by the judge for 14 more days. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:26 am
He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of ..... [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
No. 5, No. 09-1936 In plaintiff's action against a county school district under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. section 1681(a), alleging that defendants knew that an elementary school teacher sexually harassed students at another county but allowed him to ob [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
FEC, No. 08–205 The Court rules that the government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
FEC, No. 08–205 The Court rules that the government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am
With respect to Supreme Court's ruling in Southern Blvd. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:48 am
Here's the new rules (I found them here):Websites will be subject to the general advertising regulations set forth in Rule 4-7.2. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:58 am
Florida, 449 U.S. 560 (1981). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Maharaja Appliances (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court rules on section 8 and 47 of the Patents Act: Lack of disclosure under s8 = no interim injunction: Chemtura Corporation v Union of India & Ors (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Copyright access for the disabled and collaborative IP policy (Spicy IP) Bumpy road ahead – Indian government eases norms in tech transfer from overseas firms (Spicy IP) Israel Judicial Review Officer rejects request for summary dismissal and clarifies requirements… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court, in response to a petition from the Florida Bar, has withdrawn its earlier opinion on proposed amendments to rules regulating computer-accessed attorney advertising and adopted a version of the Bar's proposed amendments. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Predictably, the corporate community was a strong supporter of reliance exclusively or principally on private ordering (encouraged by the threat or actuality of shareholder proposed proxy access bylaws under an amended Rule 14a-8). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:04 pm
This is not to suggest social media use makes you immune from a state bar’s ethical rules of professional conduct. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
See The Florida Bar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:02 am
ABA Sues FTC Over Applying Creditor 'Red Flags Rule' to Lawyers
The National Law Journal
The American Bar Association filed suit Thursday against the Federal Trade Commission in the U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:02 pm
Florida. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:51 am
Friedman presents topics frequently cited by the in-house bar as affecting how they practice law now and into the sustainable future. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:46 am
Bublick, Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach, Florida, Attorney at Law, Practice Limited to Bankruptcy Law, Member of the Florida Bar since 1983 [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
