Search for: "B. Thomas and Company" Results 681 - 700 of 1,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 18 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Rittson-Thomas and Ors v Oxfordshire County Council. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, writes a blistering dissent from the denial of cert in which he asserts that “the decision below is nothing short of insurrectionist election interference. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court disagreed, because B vitamins, taurine, tyrosine and choline are bioactive. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
Whether a company serves customers or only builds something for its own use is one of the most obvious criteria for market segmentation one might imagine. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
 In 2003, when he was 54-years-old, the company reassigned him from being a claims administration director, to being a claims project coordinator. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am by Josh Blackman
§227(b)(1)(A)(iii) violates the First Amendment, though not for the reasons JUSTICE KAVANAUGH offers. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:21 pm by Giles Peaker
Or Sir Thomas Bingham’s “acid test”: is there a reasonable explanation for the conduct complained of? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
 Unlike Raich, we are facially challenging the claim that Congress has the power to impose mandates to engage in economic activity by entering into contracts both because (a) such mandates are not necessary to carry into execution the regulation of the insurance companies and because (b) the unprecedented claim of power to impose a mandate to enter into contracts with private companies is highly improper. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Lorene Park
If an employee for company A was terminated on company B’s letterhead (or by company B’s HR personnel), that could suggest that both A and B exercised control over the termination decision and both could be liable as employers. [read post]
SEC
13 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
This unit will be led by Bruce Karpati and Robert B. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:22 am
The problem, however, was that the default judgment was expressly entered against non-existent entities called "Dole Food Corporation" (not Dole Food Company) and "Shell Oil Company" (not Shell Chemical Company), and the reason the default was entered in the first place was because the Nicaraguan court didn't allow the real companies to prevent the defaults because it wasn't against them.Which obviously makes it a challenge to… [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am
., 2017-Ohio-640, upholding the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas’ dismissal of the complaint by the plaintiff-appellants Thomas Dundics and IBIS Land Group, Ltd. [read post]