Search for: "B. v. S." Results 681 - 700 of 52,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 8:00 am by Rachel Taylon
  The SEC has not questioned the court’s ability to award fees based on § 2412(b) or under its inherent power, but maintained it filed the lawsuit on a factual basis. [read post]
§ 314(d) precludes judicial review of the agency’s application of Section 315(b)’s time bar. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
After rejecting Pirate's contention that the "actual malice" standard from New York Times Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:57 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Warger v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of Colorado (EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
In Dukes, the justices split 5-4 over whether to dismiss the suit outright (the majority decision) or whether to remand for further consideration as a 23(b)(3) class action (Justice Ginsburg's position, joined by Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor). [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:33 pm
Only two of Doe’s answers on his Scantron® sheet differed from Student Bs proposed answers for those questions for which Doe did not write a proposed answer in the margin. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
On Friday we filed this reply brief in No. 08-514, Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The post Conclusory Legal Opinions of Patentee’s Expert Not Enough to Prevent 12(b)(6) Dismissal appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Robert L. Abell
It also appears to run afoul of the analysis in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:16 am by constitutional lawblogger
Judge Susan Bolton, who entered a preliminary injunction against portions of Arizona's controversial SB1070 in July 2010, including the controversial "show me your papers" provision, section 2(b), has issued a new order and opinion in del Sol v. [read post]