Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
But as you can see from the title of this blog post, a bank's administrative freeze was recently considered acceptable, in a case called Mwangi v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Concepcion held that section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempts California’s so-called “Discover Bank rule,” under which certain class arbitration waivers in consumer contracts were unenforceable as unconscionable. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:11 pm
Since Bank of America etc. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:11 pm
Since Bank of America etc. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
Let's see what you think.Iris Black got someone else's bank account information and used it to make six purchases that total $377.99. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:56 pm
”While acknowledging that unconscionability is a generally applicable doctrine of contract law, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, concluded that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California’s Discover Bank rule.Individual v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
Does Crazy SOPA-Like Attempt to Hold International Banks Liable for Pharmacy Spam Fails on Jurisdiction Grounds–Unspam v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court expanded upon Broughton in Cruz v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
In Horne v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:58 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
Does Crazy SOPA-Like Attempt to Hold International Banks Liable for Pharmacy Spam Fails on Jurisdiction Grounds–Unspam v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 8:36 pm
He could seek review and an injunction of the 1310b ruling and the whole case before the California Court of Appeals and failing that the California Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 12:34 pm
Copyright: gonewiththewind / 123RF Stock Photo In Kilby v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 12:34 pm
Copyright: gonewiththewind / 123RF Stock Photo In Kilby v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:36 am
Namely, we look to Kemp v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
Bank of America. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Peralta v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 2:28 pm
They are, respectively, Sections 3533, 3528 and 3510 of the California Civil Code. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
United California Bank (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 850, which held that, where the complaint states a cause of action in someone, but not in the plaintiff, a general demurrer for failure to state a cause of action will be sustained. [read post]
