Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 3,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
” Here is the abstract:This Essay offers some hesitation over judicial solutions to the partisan gerrymandering, hesitation consistent Justice Frankfurter’s dissenting opinion in Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Menell and David Nimmer in a separate submission also highlight inconsistency with SCOTUS’s seminal decision in Baker v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:56 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Stephens sued Safeco and Safeco’s adjuster, Baker, after a hail storm claim which resulted in a lawsuit being filed in State Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Christian baker Jack Phillips and the Colorado Civil Rights Commission … have resolved a legal dispute that set Phillips’ religious beliefs against the state’s public accommodations law”; the settlement “provides that the Commission will close an ongoing anti-discrimination probe of Phillips’s Masterpiece Cakeshop,” the subject of a high-profile Supreme Court case last term, “if… [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” In a Federalist Society video, Ashley Baker discusses “the potential implications of Justice [Neil] Gorsuch’s reasoning in his … dissent” last term in cellphone privacy case Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court held that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]