Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court"
Results 681 - 700
of 775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Eight months after a New Jersey federal judge ordered fees shifted in U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
Jensen, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
Both a federal district court and the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
Guest speakers include: Clerk of Court and Chief Deputy Clerk of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Jan Horbaly and Pamela Twiford and Clerk of Court of the US District Court for the North District of Georgia, James Hatten. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court reached a decision in Bond v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Supreme Court in Varity v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:11 am
One of these cases reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
That means that we have to set aside these Sixth Circuit district court cases: Cupek v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Omnicare Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Wash. 2009); citing Baker v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
"Panetta Aims to Get U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:17 am
The Supreme Court said in Harper & Row v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
District Court of Delaware reflects that the docket control order in the case have been cancelled, and that the case was, effectively, sent into limbo.ENTIRE DOCKET SHEET IN CFPB V NCSLT BELOW[links to documents behind PACER paywall incur charges]U.S. [read post]
