Search for: "Ball v. Ball" Results 681 - 700 of 3,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Thompson, Re Attorney-General’s Reference No 103 of 2011 [2012] EWCA Crim 135 (10 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Costello & Anor v Macdonald & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 86 (10 February 2012) YF (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 77 (10 February 2012) Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy [2012] EWCA Civ 83 (10 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Valmoria… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
A third interim order was made in March 2021 after a contested application by the father to have the child returned to Chilliwack (SZM v KMN, 2021 BCSC 365 (CanLII), (which was decided before Barendregt v Grebliunas, 2022 SCC 22 (CanLII), more on the significance of this case below)). [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 9:06 am
  Unfortunately, the First drops the ball in its Crawford analysis, and simply holds that:Second, turning to the Confrontation Clause question, in the post-Crawford v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:47 am
  A year before, the Supreme Court had ruled, in McNally v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:03 pm
Stoller, through his various entities, had both opposed Google's application to register the Google mark and also filed for registration on the Google mark for exercise balls and other sports equipment. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Related blog posts: llinois Appeals Court Ruled in Helicopter Crash Case: It Has Jurisdiction Against French Maker of Ball Bearings - Russell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Unknown
Binance Holdings Limited, June 26, 2023, Berman, A.).The ruling keeps the ball rolling in the SEC enforcement action, which charges Binance and CEO Changpeng Zhao with critical securities law violations.Disputed wording. [read post]