Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 1,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  I thought it useful to cover these issues in a short but distinct section after house searches, with United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
 The US Supreme Court granted certiorari to answer that question in Corner Post v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am by Kara OBrien
National Australia Bank The Supreme Court held 10(b) applies only where the purchase or sale of securities occurred on an American exchange or in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Meanwhile, the United States is intensifying its own campaign against the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm by jefhenninger
  Altamirano presented himself as an Ecuadorian businessman eager to establish his flower, fruit, and seafood import/export business in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:38 am by Rich Vetstein
If you need to bring cash to the closing, you must bring to closing a bank or certified check PAYABLE TO YOURSELF for the balance of the figure shown on line 303 on your HUD-1 Settlement Statement: Cash From Buyers. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]