Search for: "Bay v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:35 am
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:26 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:17 pm
In Lucy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:19 am
This post deals with the practical impacts of the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals' recent decision in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
(The Supreme Court is now considering, in a separate case [Pearson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:17 am
Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston looks at the Constitution’s Take Care Clause, at issue in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
The growth is a result of more states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:33 am
Two relatively recent and notable cases include Acceleration Bay LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
East Bay Regional Park Dist.(1st Dist.) 215 Cal.App.4th 353; Preserve Wild Santee v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit] Federal Appeals Court Sends Prop 8 Case On Detour To State Supreme Court [SFAppeal / Bay City News] [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:17 pm
The case is State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:52 am
We have before us four British nationals who brought an action alleging that they were illegally detained and mistreated at the United States Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, from 2002 until their release in 2004. ... . . . [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In contrast, in disciplinary actions pursuant to §75 of the New York State Civil Service Law the courts have held that "the imposition of multiple penalties was improper" as Civil Service Law §75.3 provides for a choice of penalties, thus prohibiting the imposition of more than one of the discrete penalties set out in the statute [see Matteson v City of Oswego, 186 AD2d 1017]. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:45 am
A similar situation was confronted in the unreported/non-precedential 2022 decision of Pjeternikaj v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) ___ Cal.4th ____, 2015 WL ______, Case No. [read post]
