Search for: "Black v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 9,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm
In La Liberte v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:18 am
In 2010, Young received a plan being drafted for a homeowner that had a black stamp which stated “If this stamp is not red it is an illegal set of plans . . . [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
Plaintiff then filed her claims in state court under the State and City Human Rights Laws. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:08 am
William Pryor.1) United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
[v] The disclosures confirm clearly that there are governance and oversight controversies at The MLC, Inc. that in my view need to be conclusively disposed of, and quickly. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In 1880, for example, it outlawed the categorical exclusion of Black people from juries in Strauder v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:20 am
That case, of course, is Lemon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:07 pm
"The Ninth Circuit agrees with the district court that these statistics and underlying data state a valid Fair Housing Act claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:58 am
Wade and Casey v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm
The recent court case of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am
" At the sixth trial, the state "engaged in dramatically disparate questioning of black and white prospective jurors" and it "then struck at least one black prospective juror, . . . who was similarly situated to white prospective jurors who were not struck by the State"Under Supreme Court precedent, the Equal Protection Clause is violated when prospective black jurors are excluded from sitting on the case because of their… [read post]
