Search for: "Boumediene v. Bush"
Results 681 - 700
of 809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
In Judge Bates’ ruling on April 2 (see this post), he concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision last June in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am
Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
Its broadest ruling so far on detainees was its 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:04 am
Among other ironies in the Mohammed case is that the Supreme Court’s Munaf decision was issued by the Court on the same day in June 2008 that it released its ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:28 am
"Kiyemba I" tests whether the federal courts, carrying out the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:35 pm
Gates (District docket 06-1669), Judge Bates had interpreted the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:38 pm
Al-Bihani’s appeal of that ruling was the first Guantanamo case to reach the Circuit Court in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 7:54 am
Bush (Circuit docket 05-5062 and others) and Al Odah v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:55 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 8:34 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
Analysis Of the 38 decisions so far by federal judges implementing the Supreme Court’s mandate in Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
” Then, Justice Kennedy wrote a major opinion for the Court in Boumediene v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
Bush, violations of the Suspension Clause. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:16 pm
” National security, it said (quoting from the Supreme Court’s detainee rights ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Washington Republican Party 169 days 7-2 3; Roberts(m), Thomas(c), Scalia(d) Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:04 am
”) Both cases were sequels to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
He wrote that in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 12:36 am
Arguing that the Executive Branch is taking legal positions that conflict directly with the Supreme Court’s Boumediene v. [read post]
