Search for: "Brady v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
Penry v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Wainwright, Brady v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, opined that there was an "epidemic" of Brady violations (referring to a failure by prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence), and suggested that this was a systemic problem that was further enabled by the chronic failure of judges to punish the offending prosecutors.IPicking up where he had left off, Judge Kozinski, joined by two colleagues in an argument in Baca v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
Richard Ortiz – well, less so.United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
King v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:00 pm
Except when it doesn’t.United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm
V, VI, IX, and XIV,NJ Constitution 1, paras.1, 10, and 2], and requirements stated in Miranda v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
United States (1985): In Diaz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 7:10 am
Mitchell and Bies v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:57 am
It was in the federal matter of United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
(The Ninth Circuit also called Wednesday for a response to the state’s and the Brady Campaign’s petition to rehear the panel’s decision not to allow intervention; but as I read the orders, that’s a separate matter — the judge’s call for rehearing was as to the Second Amendment questions in the original panel opinion.) [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
