Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 681 - 700 of 3,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
" | Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 1/18 | Beyond exclusion of pharmaceutical products from patentable subject matter as a solution to limited access to medicines in Africa | ‘Cartography and Copyright’ | Warhol v Goldsmith: fairness of use by iconic artwork adjudicated in New York. | English High Court raises eyebrows over request to disclose ISP customer data | The EU Regulation on fairness in the platform economy is a let down for intellectual property | Vallenato… [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:37 pm
As a preliminary matter, the Examiner noted that MPEP 715(II)(G) prohibits a swear-behind "where applicant has clearly admitted on the record that subject matter relied on in the reference is prior art." [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by robhealey
Below, the (A)(1)(a) section says that if the officer believes you are under the influence of alcohol he can charge you with a DUI no matter what level of alcohol is in your system. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, concluding that the drivers were properly classified as a matter of law and not entitled to trial on their claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am by Guest Author
If they are users’ speech, section 230(c)(1) protects Google (as YouTube’s parent company) from being treated as the publisher in causes of action, such as defamation, in which being a publisher matters. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, 22 NYCRR 202.16(g)(2) provides that in the discretion of the court, written expert reports may be used to substitute for direct testimony at the trial. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Whereas method claims are absolutely forbidden in order to leave the physician free to act unfettered, product claims are allowable provided their subject-matter is new and inventive (G 2/08 [5.7]). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In particular, the [patent proprietor] pointed out that - in example 3 of document D7 300 g/h of N-vinyl- 2-pyrrolidone were fed into the distillation column whereas only 185 g/h of pure N-vinyl-2- pyrrolidone were withdrawn from the column under steady state condition, which meant that only 62% of the N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone was recovered […]. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 11:48 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The Court has so far dealt, in particular, with the part of Brussels IIa dedicated to child matters, in case C in 2007, in Rinau in 2008, in A and Deticek in 2009 and in Povse, Purrucker I, McB,Purrucker II, Aguirre Zarraga and Mercredi in 2010. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:19 am by Falk Metzler
It does not matter whether or not the claim comprises additional non-technical features, which may charachterize the claimed teaching. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
The examination would then have been conducted on the basis of all claims (see T 631/97 and the Guidelines for Examination, C-III, 7.10, and C-VI, 3.1-4). [3.5.3] The equivalent rule under the EPC 2000 is R 164. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
The State Government also filed an affidavit consenting to follow the practice which was adopted for the previous academic year in the matter of admission of students by private colleges and making it clear that they do not insist that the self-financing colleges should follow the single window system. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
The High Court criticised the basis on which the Tribunal had approached this matter. [read post]