Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In terms of other interesting developments during the second quarter, two courts of appeal ground through three of highly detailed cases: California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:43 am
However, aggrieved YouTube users aren’t finding much success in court, as a recent California appeals court ruling highlighted. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Cross Docket: 11-74 Issue: Whether the court of appeals violated 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
Fortunately, the California court didn’t see it that way. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 11:28 am
Fortunately, the California court didn’t see it that way. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to revisit his decision, and it filed a Ninth Circuit appeal with the Federal Circuit. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
California v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
G052934 (4th Appellate District, California Court of Appeals, Aug.8, 2018). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
Michael appealed “the partial denial of his motion, and Pamela cross-appeals the dismissal of her harmful access by computer claim”. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Madigan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
The case was then remanded to the Northern District of California for further proceedings. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:16 am
Last month, a California appeals court upheld the conviction and restitution order. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:39 pm
California’s appeal to the Supreme Court focused less on the underlying constitutional violations than on the remedy and its consistency with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:33 am
California’s appeal to the Supreme Court focused less on the underlying constitutional violations than on the remedy and its consistency with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The Court dismisses Actavis' cross-appeal on the basis that if its products did not directly infringe, they would indirectly infringe to the extent held by the Court of Appeal.And, of course, the weekly updates Monday Miscellany and Sunday Surprises.Photo credit: rawdonfoxPREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 154 [week ending Sunday 2 July] I Book Review: Patent Drawing Rules I German Supreme Court holds that extra-territorial delivery can… [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
District Court for the Central District of California upheld the new ban, on cross motions for summary judgement. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 11:32 am
The appeals court noted that it had found only one other court—a California appeals court—which found a Brady violation in the prosecution’s failure to disclose a video tape of a sexual assault exam. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
In United National Insurance Company v. [read post]
