Search for: "CUSTODY OF P D A" Results 681 - 700 of 723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
The SOCAN v CAIP case was followed in the Internet copyright case, Davydiuk v Internet Archive Canada, 2014 FC 944, and in a competition case, Desjean v Intermix Media, Inc, 2006 FC aff’d 2007 FCA 365. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
U.S. enterprises have been particularly sensitive to the social consequences of executive and board of director conduct, even when such conduct may not necessarily violate the law. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
Written by: Ildiko Duckor and Peter Chess In light of the current regulatory environment, now more than ever, it is critical for you to comply with all of the legal requirements and best practices applicable to Investment Advisers. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
INS, No. 03-41049, 05-3319 Petition for review of an order denying cancellation of removal for failure to satisfy the seven-year continuous residence requirement of the now-repealed INA section 212(c) is denied where an application of the "criminal-offense stop-time rule" under 8 U.S.C. section 1229b(d)(1)(B) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA") to petitioner's pre-IIRIRA offense was not impermissibly retroactive. … [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:19 am
Okulsky Memorial Highway 205 S4212 VOLKER -- Increases the maximum penalty for disobeying a judicial subpoena from fifty to one hundred fifty dollars 204 S4147 MORAHAN -- Authorizes certain physicians to administer buprenorphine to addicts under certain conditions 203 S4125 LIBOUS -- Extends authorization of the county of Tioga to impose an additional one percent of sales and compensating use taxes until November 30, 2009 202 … [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:30 am by Dennis Dimka
BD&P http://www.bdplaw.com/Practice area: Business Law + Built on: SilverStripe The thing that makes BD&P’s website work so well is its tagline. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
P. 26.3 lessens the degree of deference accorded to a district court's finding of manifest necessity of a mistrial; but 3) an analysis of the factors for consideration of declaration of a mistrial contained in Comment 9.06 of the model criminal jury instructions supported the conclusion that there was manifest necessity to declare a mistrial in this case. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:02 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am by Aaron Nielson
Aaron Nielson is an associate law professor at Brigham Young University and the weekly author of D.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:02 am
Gaymon and Sanshuray from police custody later that day, stating they would receive citations in the mail for “disorderly conduct” under 18 Pa. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
The presumption of open courts The Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly stated that “[p]ublicity is the very soul of justice”[1] and that open courts are “a hallmark of a democratic society. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
("Global Panopticism: States, Corporations, and the Governance Effects of Monitoring Regimes," p. 112).The consequences of these crisscrossing currents of politics and ideology at the center of the construction of data driven governance emerge clearly in the recent efforts of the Trump Administration to include a question about the citizenship status in the 2020 Census. [read post]
  Before turning to our summary analysis of the cases, we begin with this statement by Judge Gorsuch, in a tribute to the late Justice Scalia, about how he views the proper role of judges: [P]erhaps the great project of Justice Scalia’s career was to remind us of the differences between judges and legislators. [read post]