Search for: "CWA"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Until then, CWA wetlands jurisdiction is as clear as mud. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:30 pm
Arbitrator Jack Tillem has issued an award in a dispute concerning the layoff provisions of the Verizon/CWA labor agreement. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:41 am
The NAHB filed suit claiming that, by issuing NWP 46, the Corps had unlawfully asserted jurisdiction over upland ditches, which it contends are categorically excluded from being “waters of the United States” and thus are categorically not subject to CWA regulation. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
EPA, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the State of Illinois announced a Clean Water Act (CWA) settlement with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) to resolve claims that untreated sewer discharges were released into Chicago area waterways during flood and wet weather events. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
NEDC argued that Defendants violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) and its implementing regulations by not obtaining permits (i.e. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:35 am
The court further found that the pH NEL did not comply with the CWA requirements for development of TBELs. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
MSLF has been involved in CWA cases for decades. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:33 pm
More on this settlement:www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/cwa/wrightbrothers.html ### [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:50 pm
The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground the CWA precludes a preenforcement challenge to a TNW Determination. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
§ 1369, and may instead challenge the validity of the rule in a citizen suit to enforce the Clean Water Act (CWA); and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it held that stormwater from logging roads is industrial stormwater under the rules of the CWA and the Environmental Protection Agency, even though EPA has determined that it is not industrial stormwater? [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 8:11 am
They noted that EPA had apparently decided not to finalize the draft guidance but, rather, that the Agencies were planning to address the scope of CWA jurisdiction via rulemaking. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:21 pm
We see no reason, however, that an individual landowner or developer may not contest the TNW Determination in a challenge to a site-specific jurisdictional designation under the judicial review provisions of the CWA and implementing regulations. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
Plaintiffs invoked three statutes: the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:28 am
That's a tough choice when by the compliance order, the EPA found "that petitioners had violated [the CWA] by discharging fill materials into regulated wetlands without a permit. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:15 pm
If petitioners had sought a permit, they could have obtained a final agency determination on the question of CWA coverage, and immediate judicial review of that determination, without exposing themselves to potential penalties. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
" The Court said the memo tried to expand EPA permit review role beyond that enumerated in the CWA. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:13 pm
" The same defiance is obviously true of the CWA, which has been joined by Occupy protesters in its efforts to pressure Verizon and which currently has a dozen members marching from Albany to Manhattan to join Thursday's planned day of action. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:29 am
This case involves EPA's enforcement authority under all its major statutes (CWA, RCRA, CAA and CERCLA). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
According to the rule summary, "The purpose of this co-proposal is to improve and restore water quality by collecting facility-specific information that would improve EPA's ability to effectively implement the NPDES program and to ensure that CAFOs are complying with the authority of CWA section 308 to obtain certain identifying information from all CAFOs. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:52 am
According to the rule summary, "The purpose of this co-proposal is to improve and restore water quality by collecting facility-specific information that would improve EPA's ability to effectively implement the NPDES program and to ensure that CAFOs are complying with the authority of CWA section 308 to obtain certain identifying information from all CAFOs. [read post]
