Search for: "California v. Gross" Results 681 - 700 of 858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm by Keith Kanouse
The vast majority of today's franchise agreements (that is, "one-sided, franchisor-oriented") normally contain the following provision as one of the conditions to the franchisor agreeing to renew the franchise agreement at the end of the initial term: The Franchisee will sign the Franchisor's then-current form of Franchise Agreement, which agreement may contain terms materially different than the terms of this Agreement. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Saloshin,[1] a dentist entered into a lease arrangement in which he remitted 20% of the gross revenues from his dental practices to the lessors, as partial payment for renting the space. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:03 pm by Public Protection Lawyer
  The California Nursing Board accused the nurse anesthetist of “gross negligence” over Dean’s death and a similar wrongful death  she was involved in a year earlier. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Kelly
Therefore, the Supreme Court’s decision in Poe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
District Court for the Central District of California, Lifoam Industries is required to pay a $450,000 penalty and must vent all of its manufacturing emissions through an air pollution control device. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Cal.), with respect to the Omega Chemical Superfund Site, located in Whittier, Los Angeles County, California (the “Site”). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Two earlier posts had discussed the issue and the oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:58 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
  It would be a gross misreading of the case to minimize the timing when the duty to convey these alternatives was to take place. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
(If you're itching for more about libel-in-fiction, peruse the cases citing Bindrim v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:58 am by Sean Wajert
(Another good source on this mass tort for the interested reader is Jowers v. [read post]