Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 681 - 700
of 34,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am
Hasen (University of California, Irvine School of Law) has posted The 2012 Voting Wars, Judicial Backstops, And the Resurrection of Bush V. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:17 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
Professor William Dodge (University of California - Hastings) has posted on SSRN a draft of his article, Morrison’s Effects Test, which is forthcoming in the Southwestern University Law Review. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:44 am
Answer: Yes, according to the First District Court of Appeal, Division One, in Liceaga v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:31 pm
In a recent decision by the Fifth District Appellate Court (Kirby v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:12 am
The complaint contended that defendants are in violation of California's unfair business practices law. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:50 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:48 am
Cal. 2015) A district court in California applied the ruling in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 6:08 am
That decision was Gerard v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:11 pm
In O’Grady v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
Given the frequent use of pre-litigation jury trial waivers in contracts, it may be news to some that such waivers are considered unenforceable under California law since the California supreme court’s decision in Grafton Partners L.P. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
Given the frequent use of pre-litigation jury trial waivers in contracts, it may be news to some that such waivers are considered unenforceable under California law since the California supreme court’s decision in Grafton Partners L.P. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 7:20 pm
Maybe, Under Cases Arising Out of the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:05 am
On May 20, 2010, the California Supreme Court issued an important opinion in Martinez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:05 pm
At issue in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:55 pm
In Fowler v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 11:21 am
AB 335 (Choice of Law/Forum Selection Clauses): This bill would make void and unenforceable any provision in an employment contract that requires an employee to agree to a forum other than California, or to the laws of any state other than California, for the resolution of employment-related disputes. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
That is the harsh lesson recently imparted by the California Court of Appeal in Boilermakers v. [read post]