Search for: "Charlie Savage"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2013, 1:26 pm
[UPDATED 4:53] Scott Shane, Mark Mazzetti, and Charlie Savage of The New York Times have this lengthy article on the hunt for Anwar Al-Aulaqi. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:24 pm
The New York Times’ Charlie Savage likewise reports on his remarks, as do The Hill’s Jeremy Herb and the Washington Post’s Julie Tate and Ernesto Londono, The New York Times’ “Room for Debate” blog focuses on what counts as an “act of cyberwar. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Charlie Savage at The New York Times considers the consequences if Section 5 is struck down or “otherwise gut[ted]” by the Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm
(Charlie Savage reported on case’s shifting evidence last February, which Ritika helpfully analyzed shortly thereafter.) [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
While Wells is still up at Fort Meade live-blogging, Peter Finn at the Washington Post reports, as does Charlie Savage of the New York Times, on the defense’s argument that a third party is listening in on privileged conversations with their clients. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:40 am
News and World Report, the American Prospect’s Jamelle Bouie, Scott Shane & Charlie Savage at the New York Times, Glenn Greenwald at the Guardian, Reuters, the AP, and the New York Times Conversation. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:56 pm
Charlie Savage and Scott Shane in the New York Times refer to the document as “[t]he unsigned and undated Justice Department ‘white paper. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:51 pm
Here’s Charlie Savage and Scott Shane at the New York Times, Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post, NPR, the ACLU’s Jameel Jaffer’s, a piece in the Huffington Post by Ryan J. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:43 pm
(Charlie Savage reported on case’s shifting evidence last February, which Ritika helpfully analyzed shortly thereafter.) [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
Wells spent the day up at Fort Meade again covering Judge Pohl’s assertion of his power as The Judge, and Charlie Savage reports on the transcript released from Monday’s wrongly-censored portion of the hearing over at the Times. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:09 pm
Daniel Fried’s Guantanamo resettlement office at State: The story follows this Charlie Savage piece in the New York Times, which Matt flagged yesterday. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:09 pm
The New York Times has this story by Charlie Savage, amusingly titled “State Dept. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 1:09 pm
And Ben already linked to Charlie Savage’s story in the New York Times about Brigadier General Mark Martins’ strategy in the 9/11 case, but here it is anyways. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm
Ben’s analysis of Charlie Savage’s article on the Chief Prosector prompts this reminder: tomorrow at 9 a.m., Lawfare returns to Smallwood Hall for closed-circuit, piped-in-from-GTMO hearings in the 9/11 case. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 5:56 am
The New York Times has a news analysis piece by this morning the excellent Charlie Savage, which requires a moment’s reflection. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm
Of course, it does not help the claim to keep the OLC opinion secret that it, or anyway parts of it, seem quite plainly to have been shown to the NYT’s Charlie Savage, in a leak that might well be in the category of quasi-blessed from above. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
I have also added Josh Gerstein’s excellent blog over at Politico, and the feeds of New York Times reporters Charlie Savage and Scott Shane. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:58 am
According to Charlie Savage of the New York Times, this course was very much in play. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:48 am
Charlie Savage of the New York Times has reported that both Martins’ decision and the new Justice Department brief followed a significant interagency dispute over how to respond to Hamdan II and that the Justice Department’s decision followed Attorney General Eric Holder’s overruling of Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:31 am
Apropos, here’s Charlie Savage’s latest Times piece on developments in the case; Peter Finn also discusses the supplemental filing and quotes Steve in an article for the Washington Post. [read post]
