Search for: "Citizens United v. FEC"
Results 681 - 700
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:08 am
Freed and Karl Sandstrom, Center for Political Accountability, on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Agency costs, Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:14 am
Stout, Cornell Law School, on Thursday, May 4, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Bellotti (1978), set the legal-ideological stage for SCOTUS’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:54 am
Pena dissent to distinguish discriminatory from acceptable affirmative action policies, or, most recently, the pungent conclusion from his Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
All the same, as the Chief Justice recognized in another case about overruling precedent—Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Pruitt, Jones Day, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Broker-dealers, Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Reporting regulation, Retail investors, SEC, SEC enforcement FCPA and the Commodity Exchange Act: A New Relationship Posted by David Yeres, David DiBari, and Robert Houck, Clifford Chance US LLP, on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 Tags: Anti-corruption, CFTC, Commodity… [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:55 am
FEC, Disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lobbying, Political spending, Securities regulation, Shareholder Protection Act, Transparency SEC Reopens Universal Proxy Comment Period Posted by Laura D. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
For example, in 2009 the Justices heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm
But we also indeed to adjust our expectations of them.Consider the recent case of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets Posted by James Andrus, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, on Monday, July 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, CalPERS, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 6:10 am
Schreiner, Monteverde & Associates PC, on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Discovery, Duty of care,Information asymmetries, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting Yet Another Congressional Proposed Corporate Reform: Proxy Advisory Firms in the Crosshairs Posted by Ed Batts, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 Tags: Brokaw Act,… [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 4, 2019 Tags: Arbitrage, Boards of Directors, Deal protection, Engagement, Mergers & acquisitions, REITs, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans’ Savings for Corporate Political Spending Posted by Tami Groswald Ozery, HLS… [read post]
