Search for: "Clark v. California" Results 681 - 700 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2007, 6:28 am
Clark, American University Washington College of Law Jane De Hart, University of California, Santa Barbara Jill Elaine Hasday, University of Minnesota Cynthia Hawkins-Leon, Stetson University College of Law Bernie D. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
CalPERS spokesman Clark McKinley says, "We're satisfied with the attorney general's decision not to intervene. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
Ohio and California are two of those states.As of Jan. 1, there were 191 inmates on Ohio's death row, at least 15 of whom are now plaintiffs in Cooey v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:22 pm
McDonald, 128 F.3d 481 (7th Cir.1997) (workplace search was justified in its inception because anonymous tip of employee misconduct showed sufficient signs of reliability); Clark v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
": Kathleen Clark, Washington U. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
On Sept. 29, 2006, the Board issued its decisions in Oakwood Healthcare, Croft Metals, and Golden Crest, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 3:54 am
John Wesley Hall writes on the California Supreme Court's decision last Thursday in People v. [read post]