Search for: "Clements v. Clements"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The case is officially known as Florida v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
In 2005, the SG (then Paul Clement) filed a brief in the parallel case of McFarling v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm
CLEMENT: Well, with respect, Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
No longer tethered to a desk, a land line, a fax machine, or the material world, the contemporary lawyer is freed to commune with the delightful by products of V. planifolia whilst still practicing law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
Lopez, New York v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
As I explain in the column, I thought that Paul Clement's answer was just wrong, while Mr. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:22 pm
Eric Brown: Did you catch Paul Clement’s discussion of Buckley during yesterday’s argument? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
In cases like the Court's 1936 ruling in Carter v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:29 am
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
That was in Coyle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm
Clement pretty hard. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Interestingly, he suggested tying this case to the anti-commandeering principle of New York v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:02 pm
Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority in Bond v. [read post]
