Search for: "Clements v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by David Kopel
The following exchange took place during James Feldman’s oral argument today, on behalf of the Chicago government, in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of King & Spaulding in Washington with 10 minutes for the National Rifle Association. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: City of San Clemente v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am by Michael Scutt
   The EAT took the view that both were parties to a contract and thus mutually obliged to perform their obligations, with Lady Smith (at para 87) saying; “If a party to such a contract is in material breach of one of his obligations he cannot insist that the other party perform a reciprocal term” This isn’t new law – the same principle was set out in the 2008 case of RDF v Clements all the way back to Thorneloe v McDonald & Co in… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:41 am by John Elwood
Haynes, 09–273, on cert to the Fifth Circuit (panel consisting of Jolly, Dennis, and Clement). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:49 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Solicitor General Paul Clement, who will be arguing on behalf of the NRA.Stay tuned for the decision on this one as it will affect how states can regulate our right to bear arms.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 20, 2010 Clements v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 20, 2010 Clements v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The request, the NRA noted in its motion, is opposed by the lead parties in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]