Search for: "Coats v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
Stewart will be the one with a formal morning coat over his Caps jersey. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  In the Abdi case, which I’d discussed on Thursday, I’d filed a motion with the court of appeals right after State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am by Jeffery Robinson
 Is it through litigation, legislation, state-based work, or is it all three and more? [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Sandra Guerra Thompson's new book, Cops in Lab Coats, which I understand makes an excellent stocking-stuffer. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
‘271(e)(1) states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
  As a far as I know, the constitutionality of the ban on registering trademarks containing “the flag or coat of arms of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation,” 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Kalvis Golde
Baasiri 23-568Issue: Whether a defendant’s status as an instrumentality of a foreign state under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Richard Hunt
Burlington Coat Factory of Texas Inc., 2018 WL 5023421 (E.D. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Ct. 2705, 2724 (2010) (describing Cohen as involving punishment based on “the offensive content” of the speaker’s profane message); United States v. [read post]