Search for: "Colony v. Colony" Results 681 - 700 of 1,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm by Howard Knopf
Tawfik has excellent credentials and was cited twice in the landmark 2021 Supreme Court of  Canada decision of York University v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Michael Birnhack, in Chapter 16, suggests a research venue for legal historians: that of IP in a colonial context. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:10 pm by Franita Tolson
  It is a swing state; it is the first big primary state (no offense to New Hampshire or SC);  and we will always have Bush v. [read post]
The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday heard oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
They argue that the repatriation of the Benin Bronzes would symbolize the end of colonialism because holding on to those artifacts glorifies the violence of colonialism and racism associated with it.[24] Besides the argument of colonialism, the idea of cultural property is also very present. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr. of Queens, 29 AD3d 636 [2nd Dept. 2006]; Rosa v Colonial Tr., 276 AD2d 781 [2nd Dept. 2000]). [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important judgment in the case of National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (NALSA). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Morris, 2018 ONSC 5186 “Mr. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Les cas vécus de fraude que nous rapportons ici vous feront certainement réfléchir… Canadian Legal History BlogKelm and Smith, Talking back to the Indian Act: Critical Readings in Settler Colonial Histories In honour of Indigenous Peoples’ Day today (June 21) the U of T press has compiled a list of relevant publications from their catalog. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:55 pm
In Scottish & Colonial Ltd v Australian Power & Gas Co Ltd & Ors [2007]  NSWSC 1266 the New South Wales Supreme Court decided that a general meeting of shareholders of Australian Power and Gas Company Limited (APG) called by a director could not, by resolution, remove any director from office because section 203D of The Corporations Act had not been complied with. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:41 am by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Defense - Contributory Negligence; Failure to Examine Policy The Texas Supreme Court in Colonial Savings Association v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:07 pm by Rev. Dr. Cari Jackson
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]