Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 681 - 700 of 48,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2014, 3:10 am by J
The difficulty for the tenant was that this argument had been run – and rejected – in two previous cases (Canary Riverside Pte Ltd v Schilling LRX/65/2005, LT and Staghold Ltd v Takeda [2005] 3 EGLR 45, CC) as it had been held that this was a procedural restriction which prevented the LVT from awarding costs otherwise than in very specific circumstances; it did not prevent a party from relying on a contractual right to costs.The UT accepted that analysis. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 3:10 am by J
The difficulty for the tenant was that this argument had been run – and rejected – in two previous cases (Canary Riverside Pte Ltd v Schilling LRX/65/2005, LT and Staghold Ltd v Takeda [2005] 3 EGLR 45, CC) as it had been held that this was a procedural restriction which prevented the LVT from awarding costs otherwise than in very specific circumstances; it did not prevent a party from relying on a contractual right to costs.The UT accepted that analysis. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:59 pm by Simon Gibbs
Yesterday the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group plc [2012] EWCA Civ 137 and gave us a clear answer to the question of whether interest on costs runs from the date of the costs order (the incipitur rule) or the date costs are assessed (the allocator rule). [read post]
27 May 2021, 6:23 am by Michelle David
The Tribunal has determined that the employer in the recent decision in the matter of Oasis Group Holdings (Pty) Limited v Mansoor and Others, is liable for the costs of the fund member in opposing the application on the High Court scale. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:24 am by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal has unanimously dismissed the appeal in the costs budgeting case of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1526 (part of the “Plebgate” saga). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 am by INFORRM
On 4 November 2010 I presented a paper to the “Re-framing Libel” forum on the question of costs. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 1:03 pm
When an insolvency practitioner applies to the court for directions, the estate may be at risk of an adverse costs order. [read post]