Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 681 - 700 of 29,791
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 5:47 am
s motion for expedited discovery before the parties' Rule 26(f) conference to identify the citizenship and location of defendant Tee Support, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:41 am by Jon Sands
Avila, 95 F.3d 887 (9th Cir. 1996) and US v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:04 pm
Because of the Rule 26(d)(1) requirement, the plaintiffs found themselves in a catch-22 of sorts: how could they know with whom to have the Rule 26(f) conference if they did not know the defendants’ identity. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:55 am
See Jennings, 544 F.3d at 818-19; Bohannon, 225 F.3d at 617; Baker, 50 F.3d at 1190 (upholding detention of defendant who arrived on the scene "just as the police were initiating a drug raid"). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by The Docket Navigator
"[I]f [plaintiff] intends to use an add-in as a proxy for what the Day patent technology may be worth to [defendant], [it] needs to show a market for the add-in. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:48 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The plaintiff sought leave to appeal this order under Rule 23(f), and the defendant argued that such an order was not appealable. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:25 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
And pursuant to FRCP 26(f), a court may authorize early discovery before the Rule 26(f) conference if the plaintiff shows good cause. [read post]