Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
The consolidated matter included class actions by the direct and indirect purchasers (wholesalers, retailers, consumers, etc.), as well as several actions brought by state attorneys general. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
There was no common claim or defense; the NAD proceeding was entirely voluntary, and the plaintiffs here already adequately represented the public interest against deception. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Whittington’s direction. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:56 am
The draft legislation expressively provides for the claim for information against a third party, provided the plaintiff makes an IP infringement sufficiently credible. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
The premise of those cases is that it unduly interferes with the plaintiff’s choice of a state forum for a party not originally named by the plaintiff to remove the entire litigation to federal court. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Child Support Enforcement, Appellee. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Discovery -- Expert witness -- Torts -- Trial court erred in overruling defendant's objection to plaintiff's notice of intent to serve subpoena and notice of service of expert witness request for production directed to defendant's liability expert -- Rule 1.280(b)(4) does not allow a party to serve a subpoena or request for production? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 12:18 pm
No part of this document may be disclosed in any manner to any third party. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The petitioners now simply insist that the government structure the relationship between third parties -- the insurance company and the women purchasing contraception -- in one way rather than another. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am
NSO’s clients would be required parties only if excluding them would give WhatsApp insufficient relief, or if excluding the sovereign clients would prevent them from protecting some interest they may have in the lawsuit. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:08 pm
Although Owen sold only 50 percent of his ownership interests to Acolyte, the plaintiff in this case was Blue Mountain. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Roman of the Southern District of New York certified statewide classes of consumers for New York, California and Florida based on the residences of the three named plaintiffs and the products they actually purchased. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am
First, he claimed that the Lanham Act claim could not be brought because he was not a direct competitor of Casper. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am
First, he claimed that the Lanham Act claim could not be brought because he was not a direct competitor of Casper. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
During the period from 2002 through 2016, Google displayed advertisements for nine of the 14 contact lens retailers that are parties to the Challenged Agreements, as a result of their direct bidding on 1-800 Contacts’ trademark terms prior to entering into the agreements. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The CSA permits the DEA to reclassify drugs to less restrictive schedules according to various statutory criteria, and interested parties can petition the DEA for such action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
The CSA permits the DEA to reclassify drugs to less restrictive schedules according to various statutory criteria, and interested parties can petition the DEA for such action. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:31 am
” Civil Code Art. 1954: Fraud does not vitiate consent when the party against whom the fraud was directed could have ascertained the truth without difficulty, inconvenience, or special skill. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:34 am
Here’s what it said: The Supreme Court should have granted, in effect, the plaintiff’s application for an order authorizing him to purchase the defendant’s interest in the LLC upon its dissolution. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:44 am
” The Court found that Genger acted in contempt of Court by directing his agent Ohana to delete company-related information. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 7:56 pm
By refusing to uphold an arbitration clause that the plaintiff never saw before making his purchase and did not have a significant chance to renegotiate or turn down, the court removed a substantial barrier to many Illinois consumer rights lawsuits. [read post]
