Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 681 - 700
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
” Defendants cited Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am
Zuckerman Family Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 10:14 am
Christensen, An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 ARIZ. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:29 am
Redbubble, Inc., No. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Pfizer, Inc., No. 12-60861, 2014 WL 661058 (5th Cir. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
” “The Board observed that its case law draws a distinction between “situations where the character is in the public domain and where the applicant owns intellectual property rights in the work from which the character arose. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., September 11, 2015). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:21 pm
Launch Labs, Inc., No. 18-CV-972 JLS (MDD) (S.D. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:18 am
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:37 am
Nomad Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court intended to rule on this distinction when they heard the case of Omega S.A. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court intended to rule on this distinction when they heard the case of Omega S.A. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Brands, Inc., 16 P.3d 435, 441 (Nev. 2001) (en banc) (“[W]e hold that Nevada common law does not recognize a cause of action for medical monitoring”); Wood v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court intended to rule on this distinction when they heard the case of Omega S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:54 am
Static Control Components, Inc., a case involving a software “handshake” between Lexmark printers and Lexmark-branded toner cartridges meant to keep third-party replacement toner cartridges off the market. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:29 am
In responses to Chiquita Brands, Inc., MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corporation, the Staff indicated that there appeared to be some basis for the view that the companies could exclude the proxy access proposals under Rule 14a-8(i)(3) as vague and indefinite. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court intended to rule on this distinction when they heard the case of Omega S.A. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court intended to rule on this distinction when they heard the case of Omega S.A. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Copyright Fair Use Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Industria, based on Colombia, produces and distributes food products under two relevant brand names: Zenú and Ranchera. [read post]
