Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 681 - 700 of 12,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
I strongly suspect that if the panel that heard Missouri v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As such, L&C does not raise an issue of fact warranting denial of the motion or a trial on the issue of their liability (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
But the appellate court held that this was unconstitutional, and I think this was correct, given NAACP v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Applicant asserts that the prohibition against using vocational apportionment in place of otherwise valid medical apportionment will result in ‘pass-through’ apportionment that is not substantial evidence; that defendant failed to meet its burden of proof under section 4664; and that our June 22, 2023 Opinion may result in protracted discovery and litigation. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The majority opinion reasoned that this remedy could not be distinguished from damages awarded in common law fraud cases, and therefore a jury trial in federal court was required if requested by defendants. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
Knowing that Colorado had viewed similar stances as unlawful discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, Smith, through a corporation and with the aid of conservative group Alliance Defending Freedom, sued the State. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
If the number of filings through the end of August is annualized through year end, the projected number of filings is 220, which would be the highest number of filings since 2020 and would also be close to (but slightly below) the annual average number of filings for the period 1997-2021 of 228. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
I am not alone in my belief that the numerous rulings that a ban on wearing the hijab does not violate Article 9 were unfortunate. [read post]