Search for: "Doe Entities 1-20" Results 681 - 700 of 3,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
The application was published on June 17, 1998; the notice of grant of the Patent-in-Suit was published on February 20, 2002. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:41 am by The CGCP Team
Chart 1:   The “Main Points of the Adjudication” sections for Guiding Case Nos. 20, 29, and 30—the text prepared by the Supreme People’s Court to help subsequent courts understand the GCs and how to “refer to” them—read as follows: Guiding Case No. 20, Shenzhen Siruiman Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Notably, the exclusion does not extend to family offices serving multiple families. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The alternative, requiring certain prerequisites, poses the same economic survival risks to LL.M. programs as it does to J.D. programs. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7862Issues: (1) Whether, because the age at which a capital defendant became intellectually disabled does not bear on his moral culpability, the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Steven G. Pearl
During the time period relevant to this litigation (2001–2004), Sullivan worked 74 days in California, Evich worked 110 days, and Burkow worked 20 days.Slip op. at 2. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:57 am by Diane Tweedlie
This form indicated in the "Fees" box the appeal fee ("011 Appeal fee for an appeal filed by an entity other than those referred to in Rule 6(4) and (5) EPC") and in the box for "Amount to be paid" the amount of EUR 2 255. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 5:25 am by Marco Rossi
However, outbound dividends are exempt from the 27 percent withholding tax, under the EU Parent Subsidiary Directive, provided that certain requirements are met, namely, that the recipient of the dividend, at the time the dividend is declared, is an entity that: (i) is organized in one of the forms specifically set forth in an Annex to the Directive (the “legal form requirement”), (ii) is resident of a EU Member State, under the domestic tax laws of that State, and is not… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:43 am by John P. Ahlers and Paige B. Spratt
(3) How Each Entity Provides the "Unlocatable Underground Facility" Information Varies as to Whether the Entity is a Facility Operator or End User/Project Owner. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:05 am by Brian Finucane
Although no entity has publicly claimed responsibility, the available information points squarely at Israel as having planned, organized, and conducted the action. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Ailyn Cabico
 The final rules define “venture capital fund” as a private fund that: 1) holds no more than 20% of the fund’s capital commitments in non-qualifying investments (other than short-term holdings); 2) does not borrow or is not leveraged except for a limited short-term borrowing; 3) does not offer redemption or liquidity rights to its investors; 4) represents itself to investors as pursuing a venture capital strategy; and 5) is not registered… [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
Sabine River Auth., State of Louisiana, No. 20-40138 c/w No. 22-40433 (5th Cir. 2023). [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In its communication dated 20 May 2009 the Board noted that due to the above-mentioned situation the notice of appeal appeared to contain an inconsistency concerning the name/identity of the appellant (R 101(2) and R 99(1)(a)), which has to be a registered party to the opposition proceedings (A 107) and a legal entity still existing at the filing date of the notice of appeal (T 525/94). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:22 am by Anthony Zaller
  Today’s Friday’s Five focuses on five issues employers should review regarding the joint employer analysis. 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm by Olivia Cross
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Some of those customers are using the entity's services in ways that are criminal or tortious. [read post]