Search for: "Doe Governmental Units 1-20" Results 681 - 700 of 861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm by David Hart QC
Charity Commission et al, Court of Appeal, 20 March 2012, read judgment Tangled web, this one, but an important one. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Ken Shigley
An independent judiciary serves to fragment governmental power and thus restrain the power of the state to run roughshod over the personal, property and economic rights of individuals. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by LindaMBeale
The IRS's news release, IR-2012- 15(Feb. 8, 2012), calls for written comments by April 20, 2012. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Ashcroft,1 plaintiffs (Lessig’s clients) included artisans and businesses that published and performed works that were in the public domain. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am by Jeff Gamso
The Old Testament mandates death as punishment for cursing a parent (see Exodus 21:17; Leviticus 20:9). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   As the Eleventh Circuit Court described the ACA in the decision that the Supreme Court is reviewing, “[t]he Act’s provisions are spread throughout many statutes and different titles in the United States Code. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by malik
The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 was enacted on December 20, 2007 (see News Release IR-2008-17). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In art 36(1), an enforcement court is directed that “recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award… may be refused” only on proof one of the enumerated grounds. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
To permit liability based on Rule 10b5-2(b)(1) would exceed the SEC’s § 10(b) authority to proscribe conduct that is deceptive. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
Thus, in determining whether Section 514 was constitutional, the Court examined these two aspects under Turner I: (1) whether in enacting Section 514, the Government addressed a substantial and important governmental interest that alleviated a real harm, supported by substantial evidence; and (2) whether Section 514 was narrowly tailored to advance that interest.1. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Fletcher (1866), L.R. 1 Ex. 265, aff’d (1868), L.R. 3 H.L. 330 for that loss. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
§ 41 (a), (b), and (d) (1) 15% surcharge does not apply to international stage PCT fees, certain petition fees, and enrollment fees Fee table at http://www.uspto.gov/about/offices/cfo/finance/fees.jsp Notice of Availibility of Patent Fee Changes Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 76 Fed. [read post]