Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
Corcoran, 2017 BCCA 160 the British Columbia Court of Appeal ordered a new trial in a seven year old defamation case involving British Columbia Green Party leader Andrew Weaver and the National Post. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
So, too, does concern over sex equality. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:30 pm
EFF, along with New York University’s Technology Law and Policy Clinic, filed a fried-of-the-court brief relating to this decision on behalf of the Nation’s Eric Alterman, Columbia University’s Victor Navasky, the media watchdog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), and the production company Brave New Films. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 2:13 pm
Continuing this Kats serendipitous journey of reviewing books on copyright exceptions, she comes to the last, but by no means least, of its kind in her pile: The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions, edited by Shyamkrishna Balganesh (Columbia Law School), Ng-Loy Wee Loon (National University of Singapore) and Haochen Sun (University of Hong Kong).This edited collection provides a stellar list of contributors, many of whom have been included in this… [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 1:36 pm
” [Universal City Studios v.] [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
But it does not reflect a change in whether the Court is doing law. . . . . [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
“The court does not comprehend…the insidious way that women [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
Indeed, the individual right arguments were so strong that when the Supreme Court finally got around to announcing a new Second Amendment decision, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:24 am
Does 1-19, the District of Columbia case targeting George Washington University students, he appears as a single practitioner attorney representing the RIAA plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:03 am
But does this approach make sense? [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
It does not. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 4:17 am
What does the statute say? [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
The elephant in the room, of course, is the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision on July 31, 2021 in York University v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
The "harassment" policy does ban public expression by professors. [read post]
