Search for: "Doe v. People"
Results 681 - 700
of 36,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:00 am
v=DlIXcqnVM50 Can you mention famous people in your book, play or movie? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Does anyone else find that ironic? [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:38 pm
2) Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state? [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:50 am
Supreme Court ruled inMiller v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
" Except that I'm pretty sure that the term "taint hearing" -- a phase that's used all the time by various practitioners (e.g., in criminal wiretap and child abuse cases) -- does indeed appear in Westlaw's databases, including over 200 times in the ALLCASES file. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
But Justice Swager not only does a good job of distinguishing those cases, but also making them seem to make sense. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
The conviction gets reversed.Or at least it does here. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
Where the heck does that come from?! [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
I'd have thought that to do this in every single criminal case would be clearly improper, and that everyone would recognize this fact.I'd have been wrong.The Court of Appeal does reverse the conviction here. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:49 am
Yesterday, the First Department in People v Anonymous, 2007 NY Slip Op 07069 held that this option to be resentenced does not apply to those convicted of conspiracy to commit drug offenses. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:21 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 2:50 pm
” (Lawler v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 11:27 am
Doe 1 in North Carolina, it was revealed that a North Carolina State University "John Doe" has filed an unlicensed investigation complaint against MediaSentry with the North Carolina Private Protective Services Board, the agency which regulates private investigators in North Carolina.Doe response in BMG v Doe 1Doe brief in Elektra v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
One does not consent to sex in general. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Moreover, as Judge Tauro points out, states have different ages at which people can be married; New Hampshire allows a 13 year old female and a fourteen year old male to get married with their parents consent, and no other state does. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
Does 1-7, 494 F. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
