Search for: "Doe v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 40,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm by A.J.B.
  As the norms of international law change and expand with the times, so to does the law of the United States change with them. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Bradford Kuhn
Last year, the United States Supreme Court made headlines (at least in our eminent domain world) by issuing a ruling in Knick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am by Anthony Lake
The Court's holding in Apprendi led to its holding that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory, five years later, in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
New York's Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 2009 NY Slip Op 05062, Decided on June 18, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State's Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Brian A. Comer
Defendants relied on the rule in the United States Supreme Court decision of Grable & Sons Metal Prod. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:16 am by Christopher Mathews
The press release contains little new, but it does feature a quote from LTC Lakin that sums up his defense more succinctly than before: If President Obama is a natural born citizen then the American people deserve to see proof, and if he is not, then I believe the orders in this case were illegal. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]