Search for: "Does 1 - 39" Results 681 - 700 of 5,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 10:32 am by Larry
So far, the entire analysis of this case is under GRI 1, taking into consideration only the product and the legal text of the HTSUS. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:03 pm by Bill Marler
Produce washing will decrease but not eliminate the parasite (1). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
These cases allowed me to make sure that students had retained information regarding several important aspects of the search incident to a lawful arrest doctrine: (1) when an arrest is lawful, (2) how officers can stay at the arrestee's elbow after a lawful arrest, (3) what constitutes the passenger compartment of an automobile, and (4) what makes someone a recent occupant? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:43 am
  The court also reversed an invalidity ruling of one of one claim that had been the subject of reexamination, but remanded the case to the district court for a determination of the obviousness of one claim based on a revised claim construction and for a determination of damages.While the case went to the jury pre-KSR, the court held that the district court's jury instructions on obviousness, which focused on the teaching-suggestion-motivation test, including that a… [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:46 pm
Obey's argument - 'we try to do three thing with this bill - (1) direct monies to the right war, Afghanistan, (2) protect the troops, and (3)send a message to the Iraqi politicians. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
Bettasso's offense, you can understand why he gets the sentence he does. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
The Board, however, found it clear that "although it may not be completely agreed upon what exactly the 'cloud' means, and certainly not everyone may understand what the technology does or means, it is widely understood as referring to online computing." [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:42 pm
Table of Contents for This SeriesCommissioned Salespeople & Overtime, Part 1: “How much? [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:56 pm
This conflicts perhaps with the Scalia approach to Constitutional interpretation--that the Constitutional Convention meant what it said and said what it meant and it's wrong to read the Constitution in a way that does not reflect the words and not the intentions of those good men--but it does not rewrite the law.What we see now is courts (including but not limited to the Texas Supreme Court) that have never met a businessman they didn't like, and… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm by Rob McKinney
"If you are too intoxicated to drive a car,you should not be carrying a gun,"said Mayor Bloomberg.Tennessee already has a law on the books that prohibits a person to possess a handgun while under the influence of alcohol or any controlled substance under T.C.A. 39-17-1322.However , it's okay to be drinking in the duck blind or the tree stand in Tennessee.Now the difference under the New York law is that it requires a blood alcohol level of .08 % alcohol .Tennessee… [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:25 pm by Bart Torvik
So changing the incentives at the margin probably doesn’t matter much.So what does explain this? [read post]