Search for: "Does 1 to 20"
Results 681 - 700
of 28,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
” A Notice of Allowance was issued August 20, 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:52 am
Esparza, No. 07-50293 (1-20-09). [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
P 40. [*20] We reach a similar conclusion here, and we decline the invitation of the State to follow the federal line of cases represented by Belton and Thornton. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
The same person does not have to use the property in question for 20 years in order for adverse possession to be continuous for 20 years. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 11:29 am
At least that will be the law in California starting July 1, 2008. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
Under the new law, the applicant can provide a visual representation of the sign in or with the WIPO form, not exceeding 20 cm by 20 cm. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:08 am
Kik Interactive, Inc., Case No. 20-60702-CIV-SINGHAL (S.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board thus concludes that the parameter “mean aspect ratio” is unclear and that claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 84 EPC 1973. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:04 am
The Union filed a claim against Woolworths citing breach of the collective consultation obligations under section 188(1) and by analogy Article 1(1)(a) (ii) of the Directive. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:54 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. [1], at 20, 88 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
WIPIP Session 1: TMDeborah Gerhardt (& Jon McClanahan), Colors 20 years of Qualitex: who is registering color? [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:37 am
Where does the honesty come into play? [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
The underlying theory is that, ordinarily, a person does not believe something to be true (let alone swear in an affidavit that it is “true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief”) without an affirmative justification. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
§ 1 (2016). [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:50 am
When Does This Go into Effect? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Does your compensation committee: - have a policy that it will not employ any compensation consultants who perform services for management - 30% - not have such a policy, but does not intend to employ any of the same compensation consultants as management - 50% - employ some (or all) of the same compensation consultants used by management - 20% 2. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:36 pm
Time is running out for passing bills before the Legislature adjourns June 1. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:20 am
Carter,1 Ian Hewson,1 Faheem Niazi,2 Tuo Shi,1 H. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:28 pm
The appeal of Angus is timely filed under California Rules of Court, rule 8.108(e)(1). [read post]
