Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 681 - 700 of 5,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
According to the presentation, 37 C.F.R. 11.18 (b) requires that papers filed with the PTO are certified "to the best of the party's knowledge, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances" to be for a proper purpose and nonfrivolous.Now - get this - the PTO's position is that (1) "reasonable inquiry" includes reviewing prior art submitted, and (2) applicants should not make filings "to create unnecessary delay includes not filing… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:31 am by Lisa Baird
  The first is the addition of an express proportionality requirement to Rule 26(b)(1) regarding the Scope of Discovery, and the second is a complete re-write of Rule 37(e) regarding the Failure to Preserve Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:30 am
There is one place the state does not belong and that is the church, here we have a law that clearly infringes on practicing one's religion. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
     4)  The noted provisional application contains method claim 1 and apparatus claim 5 which correspond to claims 11 and 1 of the present application. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:56 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Newman, Clevenger, Taranto)[A] Dismissal of the '605 Patent based on Narrowing AmendmentClaim 1 (with amendment)1. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the new main request is identical to claim 1 of the second auxiliary request as filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 7:03 pm by Bill Marler
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:04 am by Gordon Johnson
Why does it matter that Paul Ryan has such trouble with the truth? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am by Krzysztof Pacula
How does the anchor defendant mechanism operate in the realm of EU trade marks and actions on trade mark infringement? [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
  Procedural HistoryLutz Biedermann and Jurgen Harms (collectively “Biedermann”) appeal a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”), now the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, affirming the rejection of claims 32, 33, 35–37 37, 39, and 48 of U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm by Patricia Hughes
The claimants brought their claim under Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, but the Supreme Court stated that its analysis also applied under the Canadian Charter (Amselem, para. 37). [read post]