Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 681 - 700 of 2,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2021, 10:30 am by Andrew Hamm
§ 6330(d)(1) is a jurisdictional requirement or a claim-processing rule subject to equitable tolling. [read post]
9 May 2021, 7:20 am by Apsosredesign
While the presence of one of these factors does not guarantee a birth injury, statistically speaking, it does yield a higher chance. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
” Residents of a Contracting Party are clearly within the “jurisdiction” of that Contracting Party for purposes of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:42 pm by Geoff Schweller
The CFTC Fund Management Act would not change this and does not require outside funding. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:35 pm by McLarty Wolf Litigation Lawyers
A will is invalid if it does not comply with WESA section 37(1), unless the court orders it to be valid pursuant to WESA section 58. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
On both a federal and a state level, imposing a VMT tax does require lawmakers to make some hard decisions on trade-offs. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 2:42 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Greg Lambert  1:04 If you like this style of podcast where we focus on those people who are finding creative and innovative ways to improve the legal market, then I think you will also like something that the law firm of Seyfarth is putting out called Pioneers and Pathfinders. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Mayela Celis
Question for a CJEU urgent preliminary ruling: ‘Does Article 10 of [Regulation No 2201/2003] retain jurisdiction, without limit of time, in a Member State if a child habitually resident in that Member State was wrongfully removed to (or retained in) a non-Member State where she, following such removal (or retention), in due course became habitually resident? [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by Jackson Neagli
In the November 2019 district council elections, which were widely perceived as a referendum on the protests, pro-establishment candidates won only 58 of 452 available seats, losing the vast majority of the 300 seats they had previously controlled. [read post]