Search for: "Downs v. Taylor"
Results 681 - 700
of 924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
(mem. op.); also see Foster v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Oct. 31, 2005); Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 7:58 am
Having been brought down by a blogger he’s now on his own, out of the party and in the dock. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:43 pm
Justice Taylor of our Court of Appeal in Hoare v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:52 am
In April 2009, the Court issued a five-to-four opinion in FCC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 613 was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal from a Circuit Judge’s decision to make an outright possession order and, in particular, to refuse to make findings of fact as a basis for an appeal based on Article 6. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:22 am
Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
Last week in the Courts On 17 March 2017 judgment was handed down in the case of Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers heard 11 November 2016 (HHJ Parkes QC). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
The role of the court is to apply law to the facts of the case before it – not to legislate, not to arrogate to itself the executive power, not to hand down advisory opinion on the issues of the day. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Next Week in the Courts At 2pm on Thursday 29 September 2011 Mr Justice Nicol will hand down judgment in the case of Ferdinand v MGN (heard 4 to 6 July 2011). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP finance) United States US General Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Identity of new USPTO Director may soon be revealed (IAM) The case against PACER: tearing down the courts’ paywall (Ars Technica) US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstrief… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
