Search for: "Electronics Arts Inc" Results 681 - 700 of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
But the evidence established that Apple’s prior art reference (Lumidigm) discloses that its sensor can be incorporated into any “portable electronic device,” including wearable devices. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (Patry Copyright Blog),IP cases to watch in 2008: (IP Law360),IP legislation to watch in 2008: (IP Law360)Electronic documents as prior art at the USPTO: (IPBiz),Internet prior art must not be temporal: (IP Updates),On the reliability of Wikipedia for prior art in patent analysis: (IPBiz),‘Peer-to-patent' project: (Patent Lens), (Washington State Patent Law Blog),… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:48 am by Mayela Celis
However, these Conventions are struggling to keep up with technological developments as some States are reluctant to accept the ‘functional equivalence’ approach of some of their provisions, in particular art. 10(a) of the Service Convention and art. 9(2) of the Evidence Convention (direct service by postal channels and direct taking of evidence by the requesting State). [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Francis Pileggi
In March, 2007, Harmonix entered into a three-year agreement with Electronic Arts, Inc. for the distribution Rock Band wherein Harmonix agreed to pay sales and other fees to EA for the distribution of Rock Band and if EA met a specified “sequel threshold” by earning a certain amount of revenues, it would receive the right to distribute sequels to Rock Band. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Michael Burleigh
Laybourne sits on the boards of Electronic Arts, Inc. and J.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
”This test was applied in Keller v Electronic Arts Inc., F.3d 1268 (9th Cir. 2013) where the court found that the portrayal of a footballer in a video game did not transform the plaintiff’s identity. [read post]