Search for: "Erwin Chemerinsky"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
Erwin Chemerinsky is Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, at University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
” Commentary on the implications for constitutional law of future appointments to the Court comes from Erwin Chemerinsky, who writes in the ABA Journal that “there is no issue more important in the coming election than who will fill the vacancies that are sure to exist on the Supreme Court in the next several years. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:40 pm
" Law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has this post online today at the ABA Journal's blog. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:12 am
"A very different court": Law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has this analysis in the August 2016 issue of the California Bar Journal. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
The announcement explains: "A committee composed of members of ACS’s Board of Academic Advisors will select 10 papers and each selected author will have the opportunity to discuss his/her paper in depth with two experienced scholars, from a group that includes Erwin Chemerinsky, Pamela Karlan, Bill Marshall, Reva Siegel, Mark Tushnet, and Adam Winkler. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am
Chemerinsky, whose progressive credentials are beyond dispute, supports the law. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Ginsburg’s comments were widely criticized, but Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine School of Law, wrote an op-ed in the L.A. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
Ginsburg’s comments were widely criticized, but Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine School of Law, wrote an op-ed in the L.A. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 7:58 am
” Commentary relating to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s remarks about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, and her later comments indicating that her remarks were “ill-advised,” comes from Erwin Chemerinsky, who in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times defends Ginsburg, arguing that her “comments violated no law or ethical rule” and from Rick Hasen and Dahlia Lithwick, who contend in Slate that, even after Ginsburg’s most… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:13 am
” In an Election Law Blog podcast, Rick Hasen interviews Erwin Chemerinsky about the controversy and the broader legal issues that surround it. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:40 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky: Did Justice Ginsburg Cross the Line? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 11:50 am
” Hadi has chosen a team of five civilian counsel: Rushforth, trial counsel James Szymanski and Robert Palmer, constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky, and international law scholar Catherine Moore. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:37 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine School of Law argues that Ginsburg has a First Amendment right to attack Trump. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:15 am
Speakers will include Howard Bashman, Erwin Chemerinsky, Kaaryn Gustafson, Dahlia Lithwick, and Robert Barnes; Rick Hasen will serve as moderator. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
Erwin Chemerinsky says that he is looking forward to that. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky and Paul Butler, quoted in the ABA Journal; but note this from Prof. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:45 am
" — asked by the NYT on the occasion of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's indicating she's horrified at the idea of a Trump presidency.I addressed the question myself last night, here, and my answer is closest to what Erwin Chemerinsky writes in the NYT. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:45 am
[Cross-posted from The Faculty Lounge] This morning's New York Times has a "Room for Debate" column titled "Can a Supreme Court Justice Denounce a Candidate," with short essays by Paul Butler, Steve Gillers, and Erwin Chemerinsky. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
This morning's New York Times has a "Room for Debate" column titled "Can a Supreme Court Justice Denounce a Candidate," with short essays by Paul Butler, Steve Gillers, and Erwin Chemerinsky. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:57 am
" [Wall Street Journal] * According to constitutional law scholar Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine Law, SCOTUS may be at a turning point since the next president will likely be able nominate up to four justices. [read post]
