Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS" Results 681 - 700 of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm by Shams Hirji
  Beyond that, individual justices (as opposed to the full Court) have heard oral argument in chambers a handful of times, most recently in 1980 in Blum v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:26 am
Attorney for the Northern District of Indiana, writes: In Dickerson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 10/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 17/03/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 9/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/7/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Guest and another v Guest heard… [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:07 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Number Word Mark 7140222 MINLEARN 7151067 CHOCORITE 7151059 HIGHWAY 61 7151041 ZOTTA 7151040 JALAPERS 7151039 WUNDERKRAUT 7150973 MELTEEZA 7152599 MARIBEN 7150458 O-V-R 7150398 HISOL 7150355 I AM THEM 7150128 LOVE FOR MALAWI 7149881 FAITHFUL WARRIORS 7149433 THE VAHA COLLECTION 7149350 GROUND MAN 7149136 CHRISTIAN SLAY 7149111 THE TRUST COMPANY OF OXFORD 7148960 BLOOMINGFOODS 7152528 FREIGHTMATH 7148847 TRUCKSAFE 7148625 FORWARD HUSTLE APPAREL 7148624 7148623 BLUE FOX 7152434 MODEL G… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Are flowers and flower pots related goods? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
The medium is enjoying something of a fashionable renaissance as part of wider crafty/boho/shabby chic trends, but current interpretations appear to follow the traditional pastoral themes, using simplified silhouetted motifs of leaves, plants, flowers, birds, animals, and insects. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Idaho Contractors Board, 19-66, which likewise involves the validity of Smith, as well as Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]