Search for: "Fields v. Eu"
Results 681 - 700
of 882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Quincy Jones sues Michael Jackson's estate over royalties http://t.co/CZJIJQgolm -> Canada-EU trade agreement presages IP reform http://t.co/bAOcdznhju -> Viacom v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors” In Melzer v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Tamburo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Related posts:Povse v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:33 am
They said much the same for use of a trade mark in L’Oreal v eBay. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Yesterday I attended a Samsung v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:43 am
This project will take the 2004 Principles as its starting point and will develop them in light of: i) the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; ii) the wider acquis of binding EU law; iii) the common traditions in European countries; iv) the Storme Commission’s work; and v) other pertinent European sources. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:46 pm
Again, the idea is to ensure that TUPE does not go further than EU law requires, and also to provide clarity as to when dismissals and variations are permitted. 4. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:10 am
The product's website offers the device for sale throughout the EU, including a sales channel in the UK. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 3:51 am
Merpel sort of speculates that there is no precise analogy with the concept of Federal Pre-Emption in the United States and that EU Member States can carry on directly applying TRIPS to their hearts' content in areas where there is no EU legislation ... [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v MYRIAD GENETICS – an isolated decision? [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:19 am
Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), a decision of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on 26 March, might be described as Mr Justice Briggs' final fling in the field of IP dispute resolution before his ascent to the lofty heights of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
How much do we trust courts v. signals from the PTO? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
EU: one of the challenges of EU for Court of Justice has been to accommodate historically use-based and varying degrees of registration-based systems. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
In the 2011 Otegi Montdragon v. [read post]
