Search for: "Finger v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 1:55 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 10:21 am
A "scheduled" loss is one involving arms, hands, fingers, legs, feet, toes, eyes, ears or teeth. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
New York State Liquor Authority, in which the Second Circuit considered New York's ban on a beer label's "picture of a frog with the second of its four unwebbed 'fingers' extended in a manner evocative of a well known human gesture of insult. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Rost v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:14 pm
Go to state court. [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:54 pm
In 2014’s Kuretski v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:45 am
Note that the 2007 decision in Moore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 12:13 pm
In Guaman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am
In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
Notably, Professor Hoeppner represented complainants against Google in the DG COMP investigation that resulted in the Google Shopping decision.When the Supreme Court of the United States allowed the Pepper v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
And local authorities will now have to argue, despite the absence of any statewide legal protection for LGBT people and without the state legislature offering a finger to help, that ending such discrimination constitutes a “compelling interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
La. 2010); Gelber v. [read post]
