Search for: "Fish v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 1,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:07 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States Fish and Wildlife Service Case: Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v DeVries Case: Apple Inc. v. [read post]
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:45 am by bryannewland
Our tribes retained the right to fish in the ceded waters under that treaty; a fact that was confirmed in the landmark case of United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
 See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, in which the Court was persuaded that a taking could exist for temporary flooding situations, arguably expanding the scope of another leading regulatory takings decision, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 11:18 am by David S. Jones
   The H-2B non-agricultural temporary worker program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary non-agricultural jobs. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Eric Goldman
McCraney * Request for Discovery of Facebook Profile and Photos Rejected as a Fishing Expedition — McCann v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Since it's a very interesting piece of work in its own right, I'll help Name That Tune by giving a fairly expansive snippet thereof:"Four months ago, in United States v. [read post]