Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2013, 9:36 pm by James Hamilton
The definition would include natural persons that are U.S. residents as well as corporations, business entities and funds that are organized in the United States or have their principle place of business here. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:49 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Faleomavaega Panel 7 — Policing Violence against Indian Women — Sarah Deer, Christi Belcourt, Sam Hirsch Panel 8 — Tribes, States, and Taxes — Gabriel Galanda, Shana Barehand, Mary Streitz Break-out Panel 1 — United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
United States, explaining that the Court’s narrow interpretation of the statute at issue “only reinforces rules prohibiting lawyers from giving unethical advice. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am by Larry
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Whether it leads to theocracy or balkanization, the creeping fusion of church and state is disastrous for the public good.Let’s be frank: religions need to obey the laws. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Background on Forms 13F and 13H Under Exchange Act Section 13(f)(1), institutional investment managers that use the United States mail (or other means or instrumentality of interstate commerce) in the course of their business and that exercise investment discretion over $100 million or more in Section 13(f) securities may be required to file quarterly reports listing such securities positions on SEC Form 13F.[2] Section 13(f) securities are defined as equity securities of a class… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Tuesday’s oral argument is in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
in Kohler v West End 84 Units LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 34215(U) November 26, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654985/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 12:10 pm by Gustav L. Schmidt
  We previously blogged about this petition, which was submitted by a group of ten law professors in response to the Supreme Court’s opinion in the Citizens United v. [read post]