Search for: "Friday v. Friday"
Results 681 - 700
of 13,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 3:33 am
On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 8:24 am
Friday's advance release opinion: Zubrowski v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:50 am
In Arista v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Low (Legal Adviser to the Scotch Whisky Association) reports delightedly that Scotland got there first back in July 2008 when Ladies Paton, Smith and Dorrian, an all-female bench of the Inner House of the Court of Session (Scotland’s Civil Appeal Court), heard the appeal in the passing off case of Wise Property Care Limited v White Thomson Preservation Limited and Others. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Similarities can be drawn with the recent case of Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) [discussed by the IPKat here] in which the pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against the retail moguls Topshop, who used her image on a T-shirt without her permission (although Topshop thought they were on solid ground by getting a licence from the photographer to use the picture). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
At the close of 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its eagerly awaited and widely publicized judgment in Thaler v Comptroller-General confirming that a patent application may not name an AI machine as an inventor. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
A comparative reprise", guest Kat Alberto Bellan discussed reactions to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-530/12 P OHIM v National Lottery Commission, [explained in his earlier Katpost here] in which that court set aside a decision of the General Court that had effectively allowed the cancellation of National Lottery's Community trade mark on the basis of evidence which was plainly fake but which was… [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 5:13 am
Essential developments will be examined including Unwired Planet v Huawei and FRAND enforcement; EU Trade Secrets Directive; draft French patent law and the role of plausibility in patent validity. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
On the jiplp weblog there's an analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union's latest "clarification" of European law on the registration of product shapes as trade marks in Hauck v Stokke, the "Tripp Trapp" chair case. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
On Wednesday this Kat reported on the latest intellectual property-flavoured dispute to be referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling, Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
Cases reported in this issue include the European Court of Human Rights decision in Balan v Moldova, where the uncompensated appropriation of Balan's photo of Soroca Castle for use on official Moldovan identity cards was held to breach Balan's human rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:47 am
She'll be back next week, though, with news of the Viacom v YouTube arguments and cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The jiplp weblog carries a crisp, clear account by Peter Jabaly of the US decision in Air-Freshner v Paul Getty and the limited utility of fair use defences in trade mark infringement proceedings. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
There's some interesting material to be found here: not just local Ukrainian stuff but a review of decisions of the European Commission and the European Union's courts together with a feature on th very IP-flavoured topic of official sponsorship v ambush marketing. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
The new judge is Lord Malcolm who, under his maiden name of Colin Campbell QC, was Senior Counsel for Norton in the patent infringement action of Organon v Norton joined with the Petition of Arrow Generics for revocation of the Tibolone patents (see IPKat note here). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:10 am
So, if [and ONLY if, growls the Kat] you (i) love trade marks, (ii) either know how to blog or are willing to learn, (iii) are professionally or academically competent to discuss trade mark issues, (iv) possess a high level of literacy and proficiency in English and (v) you or your employer are a member of MARQUES, Jeremy would love to hear from you. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
Anyone who was bored or intimidated by the admittedly long IPKat post on Edwin v OHIM, Elio Fiorucci can read a shorter, more accessible account on Class 46 here. [read post]
